SEO Mistakes Water Restoration Companies Make

Restoration SEO automation for Hazel Dell WA

In the ever-competitive world of digital marketing, water restoration companies often find themselves battling for visibility online. Google Ads Experiences That Lead to Calls . Search engine optimization (or SEO, as its commonly known) is crucial in helping these businesses reach potential clients. However, many make some common mistakes that can seriously hinder their online presence. Emergency restoration teams Lets dive into a few of these blunders.

First and foremost, one of the biggest mistakes water restoration companies make is neglecting local SEO. These businesses are, by nature, local services. Theyre not selling products across the country or globe, so why target broad keywords that dont help reach the local audience? (Its baffling!) Failing to optimize for local searches means missing out on customers who are actively seeking out services in their area.

Another common error is having a website thats not mobile-friendly. In todays world, people use their phones for almost everything (shopping, searching for services, you name it). If your site doesnt load properly on a smartphone, potential customers will likely click away in frustration. You cant afford that! A responsive design isnt just a nice-to-have; its a necessity.

Content is king, right? But producing low-quality, irrelevant content is a mistake that many water restoration companies make. It's not enough to just churn out blog posts; they need to be informative, well-written, and relevant to what the audience is searching for. Plus, stuffing keywords unnaturally into content is a big no-no. Search engines are smarter than that now, and theyll penalize you for trying to game the system.

Lets not forget about the importance of backlinks. Not having a strategy for building quality backlinks is like trying to build a house without a solid foundation. But beware! Not all backlinks are created equal. Engaging in sketchy practices to acquire links can do more harm than good. Its important to earn links from reputable sources (not some random site that nobodys ever heard of).

Oh, and then theres the mistake of ignoring site speed. A slow-loading site is a huge turn-off for visitors and can negatively impact your search rankings. post‑flood cleanup seo People just don't have the patience to wait around, and they wont hesitate to move on to a competitors site.

SEO Mistakes Water Restoration Companies Make - Emergency restoration teams

  1. Restoration SEO automation for Hazel Dell WA
  2. Emergency restoration teams
  3. post‑flood cleanup seo
Its crucial to ensure your website loads quickly and efficiently.

Finally, many water restoration companies don't keep track of their SEO efforts. They might set up a few things initially but then never revisit them. SEO isn't a set-it-and-forget-it task. It requires ongoing attention and adjustments. By not analyzing and adapting, businesses risk falling behind their competitors who are actively improving their strategies.

In conclusion, while SEO might seem daunting, avoiding these common mistakes can make a significant difference for water restoration companies. It's about being smart, staying informed, and continuously adapting to the ever-evolving digital landscape. After all, you don't want to be left high and dry!

 

Search engine marketing (SEM) is a form of Internet marketing that involves the promotion of websites by increasing their visibility in search engine results pages (SERPs) primarily through paid advertising.[1] SEM may incorporate search engine optimization (SEO), which adjusts or rewrites website content and site architecture to achieve a higher ranking in search engine results pages to enhance pay-per-click (PPC) listings and increase the call to action (CTA) on the website.[2]

Market

[edit]

In 2007, U.S. advertisers spent US $24.6 billion on search engine marketing.[3] In Q2 2015, Google (73.7%) and the Yahoo/Bing (26.3%) partnership accounted for almost 100% of U.S. search engine spend.[4] As of 2006, SEM was growing much faster than traditional advertising and even other channels of online marketing.[5] Managing search campaigns is either done directly with the SEM vendor or through an SEM tool provider. It may also be self-serve or through an advertising agency.

Search engine marketing is also a method of business analytics, which is mainly aimed at providing useful information for organizations to find business opportunities and generate profits. SEM can help organizations optimize their marketing and gather more audience and create more customers.[6]

Google's market dominance

[edit]

As of October 2016, Google leads the global search engine market with a market share of 89.3%. Bing comes second with a market share of 4.36%, Yahoo comes third with a market share of 3.3%, and Chinese search engine Baidu is fourth globally with a share of about 0.68%.[7]

In August 2024, Google's search engine was declared by a court to be a monopoly over the market.[8] During the trial, the US Department of Justice argued "Google hasn’t just illegally cornered the market in search — it’s squeezed online publishers and advertisers with a “trifecta” of monopolies that have harmed virtually the entire World Wide Web"[9]

History

[edit]

As the number of sites on the Web increased in the mid-to-late 1990s, search engines started appearing to help people find information quickly. Search engines developed business models to finance their services, such as pay per click programs offered by Open Text[10] in 1996 and then Goto.com[11] in 1998. Goto.com later changed its name[12] to Overture in 2001, was purchased by Yahoo! in 2003, and now offers paid search opportunities for advertisers through Yahoo! Search Marketing. Google also began to offer advertisements on search results pages in 2000 through the Google AdWords program. By 2007, pay-per-click programs proved to be primary moneymakers[13] for search engines. In a market dominated by Google, in 2009 Yahoo! and Microsoft announced the intention to forge an alliance. The Yahoo! & Microsoft Search Alliance eventually received approval from regulators in the US and Europe in February 2010.[14]

Search engine optimization consultants expanded their offerings to help businesses learn about and use the advertising opportunities offered by search engines, and new agencies focusing primarily upon marketing and advertising through search engines emerged. The term "search engine marketing" was popularized by Danny Sullivan in 2001[15] to cover the spectrum of activities involved in performing SEO, managing paid listings at the search engines, submitting sites to directories, and developing online marketing strategies for businesses, organizations, and individuals.

Methods and metrics

[edit]

Search engine marketing uses at least five methods and metrics to optimize websites.[16]

  1. Keyword research and analysis involve three "steps": ensuring the site can be indexed in the search engines, finding the most relevant and popular keywords for the site and its products, and using those keywords on the site in a way that will generate and convert traffic. A follow-on effect of keyword analysis and research is the search perception impact. Search perception impact describes the identified impact of a brand's search results on consumer perception, including title and meta tags, site indexing, and keyword focus. As online searching is often the first step for potential consumers/customers, the search perception impact shapes the brand impression for each individual.
  2. Website saturation and popularity, or how much presence a website has on search engines, can be analyzed through the number of pages of the site that are indexed by search engines (saturation) and how many backlinks the site has (popularity). It requires pages to contain keywords people are looking for and ensure that they rank high enough in search engine rankings. Most search engines include some form of link popularity in their ranking algorithms. The following are major tools measuring various aspects of saturation and link popularity: Link Popularity, Top 10 Google Analysis, and Marketleap's Link Popularity and Search Engine Saturation.
  3. Back end tools, including Web analytic tools and HTML validators, provide data on a website and its visitors and allow the success of a website to be measured. They range from simple traffic counters to tools that work with log files and to more sophisticated tools that are based on page tagging (putting JavaScript or an image on a page to track actions). These tools can deliver conversion-related information. Validators check the invisible parts of websites, highlighting potential problems and many usability issues and ensuring websites meet W3C code standards. Try to use more than one HTML validator or spider simulator because each one tests, highlights, and reports on slightly different aspects of your website.
  4. Whois tools reveal the owners of various websites and can provide valuable information relating to copyright and trademark issues.
  5. Google Mobile-Friendly Website Checker: This test will analyze a URL and report if the page has a mobile-friendly design.[17]

Search engine marketing is a way to create and edit a website so that search engines rank it higher than other pages. It should be also focused on keyword marketing or pay-per-click advertising (PPC). The technology enables advertisers to bid on specific keywords or phrases and ensures ads appear with the results of search engines.

With the development of this system, the price is growing under a high level of competition. Many advertisers prefer to expand their activities, including increasing search engines and adding more keywords. The more advertisers are willing to pay for clicks, the higher the ranking for advertising, which leads to higher traffic.[18] PPC comes at a cost. The higher position is likely to cost $5 for a given keyword, and $4.50 for a third location. A third advertiser earns 10% less than the top advertiser while reducing traffic by 50%.[18]

Investors must consider their return on investment when engaging in PPC campaigns. Buying traffic via PPC will deliver a positive ROI when the total cost-per-click for a single conversion remains below the profit margin. That way the amount of money spent to generate revenue is below the actual revenue generated.

There are many reasons explaining why advertisers choose the SEM strategy. First, creating a SEM account is easy and can build traffic quickly based on the degree of competition. The shopper who uses the search engine to find information tends to trust and focus on the links showed in the results pages. However, a large number of online sellers do not buy search engine optimization to obtain higher ranking lists of search results but prefer paid links. A growing number of online publishers are allowing search engines such as Google to crawl content on their pages and place relevant ads on it.[19] From an online seller's point of view, this is an extension of the payment settlement and an additional incentive to invest in paid advertising projects. Therefore, it is virtually impossible for advertisers with limited budgets to maintain the highest rankings in the increasingly competitive search market.

Google's search engine marketing is one of the western world's marketing leaders, while its search engine marketing is its biggest source of profit.[20] Google's search engine providers are clearly ahead of the Yahoo and Bing network. The display of unknown search results is free, while advertisers are willing to pay for each click of the ad in the sponsored search results.

[edit]

Paid inclusion involves a search engine company charging fees for the inclusion of a website in their results pages. Also known as sponsored listings, paid inclusion products are provided by most search engine companies either in the main results area or as a separately identified advertising area.

The fee structure is both a filter against superfluous submissions and a revenue generator. Typically, the fee covers an annual subscription for one webpage, which will automatically be catalogued on a regular basis. However, some companies are experimenting with non-subscription based fee structures where purchased listings are displayed permanently. A per-click fee may also apply. Each search engine is different. Some sites allow only paid inclusion, although these have had little success. More frequently, many search engines, like Yahoo!,[21] mix paid inclusion (per-page and per-click fee) with results from web crawling. Others, like Google (and as of 2006, Ask.com[22][23]), do not let webmasters pay to be in their search engine listing (advertisements are shown separately and labeled as such).

Some detractors of paid inclusion allege that it causes searches to return results based more on the economic standing of the interests of a web site, and less on the relevancy of that site to end-users.

Often the line between pay per click advertising and paid inclusion is debatable. Some have lobbied for any paid listings to be labeled as an advertisement, while defenders insist they are not actually ads since the webmasters do not control the content of the listing, its ranking, or even whether it is shown to any users. Another advantage of paid inclusion is that it allows site owners to specify particular schedules for crawling pages. In the general case, one has no control as to when their page will be crawled or added to a search engine index. Paid inclusion proves to be particularly useful for cases where pages are dynamically generated and frequently modified.

Paid inclusion is a search engine marketing method in itself, but also a tool of search engine optimization since experts and firms can test out different approaches to improving ranking and see the results often within a couple of days, instead of waiting weeks or months. Knowledge gained this way can be used to optimize other web pages, without paying the search engine company.

Comparison with SEO

[edit]

SEM is the wider discipline that incorporates SEO. SEM includes both paid search results (using tools like Google AdWords or Bing Ads, formerly known as Microsoft adCenter) and organic search results (SEO). SEM uses paid advertising with AdWords or Bing Ads, pay per click (particularly beneficial for local providers as it enables potential consumers to contact a company directly with one click), article submissions, advertising and making sure SEO has been done. A keyword analysis is performed for both SEO and SEM, but not necessarily at the same time. SEM and SEO both need to be monitored and updated frequently to reflect evolving best practices.

In some contexts, the term SEM is used exclusively to mean pay per click advertising,[2] particularly in the commercial advertising and marketing communities which have a vested interest in this narrow definition. Such usage excludes the wider search marketing community that is engaged in other forms of SEM such as search engine optimization and search retargeting.

Creating the link between SEO and PPC represents an integral part of the SEM concept. Sometimes, especially when separate teams work on SEO and PPC and the efforts are not synced, positive results of aligning their strategies can be lost. The aim of both SEO and PPC is maximizing the visibility in search and thus, their actions to achieve it should be centrally coordinated. Both teams can benefit from setting shared goals and combined metrics, evaluating data together to determine future strategy or discuss which of the tools works better to get the traffic for selected keywords in the national and local search results. Thanks to this, the search visibility can be increased along with optimizing both conversions and costs.[24]

Another part of SEM is social media marketing (SMM). SMM is a type of marketing that involves exploiting social media to influence consumers that one company’s products and/or services are valuable.[25] Some of the latest theoretical advances include search engine marketing management (SEMM). SEMM relates to activities including SEO but focuses on return on investment (ROI) management instead of relevant traffic building (as is the case of mainstream SEO). SEMM also integrates organic SEO, trying to achieve top ranking without using paid means to achieve it, and pay per click SEO. For example, some of the attention is placed on the web page layout design and how content and information is displayed to the website visitor. SEO & SEM are two pillars of one marketing job and they both run side by side to produce much better results than focusing on only one pillar.

Ethical questions

[edit]

Paid search advertising has not been without controversy and the issue of how search engines present advertising on their search result pages has been the target of a series of studies and reports[26][27][28] by Consumer Reports WebWatch. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) also issued a letter[29] in 2002 about the importance of disclosure of paid advertising on search engines, in response to a complaint from Commercial Alert, a consumer advocacy group with ties to Ralph Nader.

Another ethical controversy associated with search marketing has been the issue of trademark infringement. The debate as to whether third parties should have the right to bid on their competitors' brand names has been underway for years. In 2009 Google changed their policy, which formerly prohibited these tactics, allowing 3rd parties to bid on branded terms as long as their landing page in fact provides information on the trademarked term.[30] Though the policy has been changed this continues to be a source of heated debate.[31]

On April 24, 2012, many started to see that Google has started to penalize companies that are buying links for the purpose of passing off the rank. The Google Update was called Penguin. Since then, there have been several different Penguin/Panda updates rolled out by Google. SEM has, however, nothing to do with link buying and focuses on organic SEO and PPC management. As of October 20, 2014, Google had released three official revisions of their Penguin Update.

In 2013, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. that online contact lens seller Lens.com did not commit trademark infringement when it purchased search advertisements using competitor 1-800 Contacts' federally registered 1800 CONTACTS trademark as a keyword. In August 2016, the Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint against 1-800 Contacts alleging, among other things, that its trademark enforcement practices in the search engine marketing space have unreasonably restrained competition in violation of the FTC Act. 1-800 Contacts has denied all wrongdoing and appeared before an FTC administrative law judge in April 2017.[32]

Examples

[edit]

Google Ads is recognized as a web-based advertising utensil since it adopts keywords that can deliver adverts explicitly to web users looking for information in respect to a certain product or service. It is flexible and provides customizable options like Ad Extensions, access to non-search sites, leveraging the display network to help increase brand awareness. The project hinges on cost per click (CPC) pricing where the maximum cost per day for the campaign can be chosen, thus the payment of the service only applies if the advert has been clicked. SEM companies have embarked on Google Ads projects as a way to publicize their SEM and SEO services. One of the most successful approaches to the strategy of this project was to focus on making sure that PPC advertising funds were prudently invested. Moreover, SEM companies have described Google Ads as a practical tool for increasing a consumer’s investment earnings on Internet advertising. The use of conversion tracking and Google Analytics tools was deemed to be practical for presenting to clients the performance of their canvas from click to conversion. Google Ads project has enabled SEM companies to train their clients on the utensil and delivers better performance to the canvass. The assistance of Google Ads canvass could contribute to the growth of web traffic for a number of its consumer’s websites, by as much as 250% in only nine months.[33]

Another way search engine marketing is managed is by contextual advertising. Here marketers place ads on other sites or portals that carry information relevant to their products so that the ads jump into the circle of vision of browsers who are seeking information from those sites. A successful SEM plan is the approach to capture the relationships amongst information searchers, businesses, and search engines. Search engines were not important to some industries in the past, but over the past years the use of search engines for accessing information has become vital to increase business opportunities.[34] The use of SEM strategic tools for businesses such as tourism can attract potential consumers to view their products, but it could also pose various challenges.[35] These challenges could be the competition that companies face amongst their industry and other sources of information that could draw the attention of online consumers.[34] To assist the combat of challenges, the main objective for businesses applying SEM is to improve and maintain their ranking as high as possible on SERPs so that they can gain visibility. Therefore, search engines are adjusting and developing algorithms and the shifting criteria by which web pages are ranked sequentially to combat against search engine misuse and spamming, and to supply the most relevant information to searchers.[34] This could enhance the relationship amongst information searchers, businesses, and search engines by understanding the strategies of marketing to attract business.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "The State of Search Engine Marketing 2006". Search Engine Land. February 8, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-02-10. Retrieved 2007-06-07.
  2. ^ a b "Does SEM = SEO + CPC Still Add Up?". searchengineland.com. 2010-03-04. Retrieved 2010-03-05.
  3. ^ "IAB: Search Was 50% Of US Digital Ad Spend In 2014, Desktop Still Bigger Than Mobile". searchengineland.com. 22 April 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2018.
  4. ^ "CMO by Adobe |" (PDF). www.cmo.com. Retrieved 2025-01-11.
  5. ^ Elliott, Stuart (March 14, 2006). "More Agencies Investing in Marketing With a Click". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-06-07.
  6. ^ Rialp, Alex; Rialp, Josep (2006), International Marketing Research: Opportunities and Challenges in the 21st Century, Advances in International Marketing, vol. 17, Bingley: Emerald (MCB UP ), pp. 1–13, doi:10.1016/s1474-7979(06)17019-2, ISBN 0-7623-1369-2
  7. ^ "Top 5 Desktop Tables and Console Search Engine Market Share". statcounter.com. October 2016. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
  8. ^ "A court says Google is a monopolist. Now what?". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2024-11-18.
  9. ^ Fung, Brian (2024-09-09). "Google's search business was declared to be a monopoly. Now its ad business is on trial". CNN. Retrieved 2024-11-18.
  10. ^ "Engine sells results, draws fire". news.cnet.com. June 21, 1996. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
  11. ^ "GoTo Sells Positions". searchenginewatch.com. March 3, 1998. Archived from the original on October 11, 2007. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
  12. ^ "GoTo gambles with new name". news.cnet.com. September 10, 2001. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
  13. ^ Jansen, B. J. (May 2007). "The Comparative Effectiveness of Sponsored and Nonsponsored Links for Web E-commerce Queries" (PDF). ACM Transactions on the Web. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-30. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
  14. ^ "Microsoft-Yahoo Deal Gets Green Light". informationweek.com. February 18, 2010. Retrieved 2010-07-15.
  15. ^ "Does SEM = SEO + CPC Still Add Up?". search engine land.com. March 4, 2010. Retrieved 2013-10-06.
  16. ^ King, Andrew B. (2008). Website Optimization. "O'Reilly Media, Inc.". ISBN 978-0-596-51508-9.
  17. ^ "Mobile-Friendly Test - Google Search Console". www.google.com. Retrieved 15 March 2018.
  18. ^ a b Boughton, S. B. (2005). Search engine marketing. Perspectives in business, 20(4), 195-202.
  19. ^ Sen, R. (2005). Optimal search engine marketing strategy. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 9-25.
  20. ^ Skiera, B., Eckert, J., & Hinz, O. (2010). An analysis of the importance of the long tail in search engine marketing. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 488-494.
  21. ^ Zawodny, Jeremy (2004-03-01). "Defending Paid Inclusions".
  22. ^ Ulbrich, Chris (2004-07-06). "Paid Inclusion Losing Charm?". Wired News.
  23. ^ "FAQ #18: How do I register my site/URL with Ask so that it will be indexed?". Ask.com. Archived from the original on 2012-07-07. Retrieved 2008-12-19.
  24. ^ Julian Connors (2016-10-06). "PPC + SEO = match made in marketing heaven". Retrieved 2017-04-26.
  25. ^ Susan Ward (2011). "Social Media Marketing". About.com. Archived from the original on 2015-03-25. Retrieved 2011-04-22.
  26. ^ "False Oracles: Consumer Reaction to Learning the Truth About How Search Engines Work (Abstract)". consumerwebwatch.org. June 30, 2003. Archived from the original on December 10, 2005. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
  27. ^ "Searching for Disclosure: How Search Engines Alert Consumers to the Presence of Advertising in Search Results". consumerwebwatch.org. November 8, 2004. Archived from the original on December 26, 2005. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
  28. ^ "Still in Search of Disclosure: Re-evaluating How Search Engines Explain the Presence of Advertising in Search Results". consumerwebwatch.org. June 9, 2005. Archived from the original on November 24, 2005. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
  29. ^ "Re: Complaint Requesting Investigation of Various Internet Search Engine Companies for Paid Placement or (Pay per click)". ftc.gov. June 22, 2002. Archived from the original on July 23, 2013. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
  30. ^ "Update to U.S. ad text trademark policy". adwords.blogspot.com. May 14, 2009. Retrieved 2010-07-15.
  31. ^ Rosso, Mark; Jansen, Bernard (Jim) (August 2010), "Brand Names as Keywords in Sponsored Search Advertising", Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27 (1): 81–98, doi:10.17705/1CAIS.02706
  32. ^ David O. Klein & Joshua R. Wueller, Trademark Enforcement and Internet Search Advertising: A Regulatory Risk for Brand Owners, IP Litigator, Nov./Dec. 2016.
  33. ^ Google Inc (2007). "Google Adwords Case Study" (PDF). AccuraCast. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 January 2017. Retrieved 2011-03-30. cite web: |author= has generic name (help)
  34. ^ a b c Zheng Xiang; Bing Pan; Rob Law & Daniel R. Fesenmaier (June 7, 2010). "Assessing the Visibility of Destination Marketing Organizations in Google: A Case Study of Convention and Visitor Bureau Websites in the United States" (PDF). Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. Retrieved 2011-04-22.
  35. ^ Bing Pan, Zheng Xiang, Rob Law and Daniel R. Fesenmaier (June 7, 2010). "The Dynamics of Search Engine Marketing for Tourist Destinations". Journal of Travel Research. 50 (4): 365–377. doi:10.1177/0047287510369558. S2CID 14193592.cite journal: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

 

Washington State University Vancouver
Mt. St. Helens as seen from WSU Vancouver with students walking on campus path in foreground.
WSU Vancouver in April 2016.
Type Public
Established 1989
Chancellor Sandra Haynes (interim)
President Elizabeth R. Cantwell
Academic staff
180
Students 3,504
Location
Vancouver address
, ,
Campus Suburb
351 acres (1.42 km2)
Colors Crimson and Gray    
Nickname WSUV, VanCougs, Cougs, Cougars
Mascot Butch T. Cougar
Website vancouver.wsu.edu
Map

Washington State University Vancouver (also WSU Vancouver) is a regional campus of Washington State University.

WSU Vancouver is located on a 351-acre (1.42 km2) campus outside of Vancouver, Washington, approximately eight miles (13 km) north of the Columbia River and 17 miles (27 km) north of downtown Portland, Oregon. Degrees offered by WSU Vancouver are conferred by Washington State University. Previously an undergraduate transfer college, WSU Vancouver expanded to a full four-year university in 2006.[1]

It is in the Mount Vista census-designated place.[2]

History

[edit]

Washington State University began offering courses in Southwest Washington in 1983 as part of the Southwest Washington Joint Center for Education. In 1989, the university in Pullman formally established Washington State University Vancouver as a branch campus of the state's land-grant institution.[3]

In 1990, the Washington State Higher Education Coordinating Board approved placing the campus at Salmon Creek, a community north of Vancouver. The site was chosen over two other finalists, a campus adjacent to Clark College and a site in Mlll Plain.[4]

The current campus opened in 1996. In Fall 2006, WSU Vancouver admitted freshmen and sophomores for the first time and began offering lower-division courses.[3]

Campus resources

[edit]

The 351-acre (1.42 km2) campus has many computing and research laboratories, including student computing labs, fabrication labs, science research labs, group instruction labs, fine arts labs, a circuits and microprocessors lab, computer-aided drafting lab and a writing center. The science resources and instrumentation possessed by the campus consist of GC/MS, HPLC (UVvis), DNA sequencer, TOC/N, RT-PCR, Flame ionization detector, two Phantom cameras, a scanning electron microscope, an Instron tensile tester, and a confocal microscope, along with a fully functional cleanroom.

WSU Vancouver's library has more than 800 journals in hardcopy and over 9,000 full-text online journals and newspapers, a core collection of more than 30,000 books and access to more than 100 major bibliographic databases. The library participates in several local and regional library consortia, including the Portland Area Library System and ORBIS/CASCADE (the Oregon and Washington Cooperative Library Project). It also houses the Environmental Information Cooperative Library.

Academic programs

[edit]

WSU Vancouver offers bachelor's degrees, master's degrees, and doctorate degrees in more than 40 fields of study.[5] Students may also be enrolled in science graduate study programs in the School of Biological Sciences in Pullman and pursue their entire degree at WSU Vancouver; greatly enhancing the number of degrees available at the master's and doctoral level by proxy.[6]

Research Labs

[edit]

The School of Engineering and Computer Science at WSU Vancouver operates several research laboratories, including the Nanomaterials-Sensor Laboratory, Wireless Circuit and System Research Lab, Computer Aided Engineering Lab, Electric Power Systems Lab, Robotics and Automation Lab, Radio Frequency (RF) Research Laboratory, Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Lab, Micro-Nano-Bio Systems Lab, Electrochemical Engineering Lab, Fluid Dynamics Lab, Interfacial Fluid Dynamics Lab, Parallel and Distributed Data Management Systems Lab, Distributed Systems Research Lab.[7] Usually faculties receive funding from government agencies, and local companies. There are also many research labs in the School of Environmental Science, Biology, Mathematics, and Neuroscience. These include the aquatic ecology lab, conservation biology lab, and the ecology of Mt. St. Helens, among others.

Students

[edit]

The opening of the Firstenburg Student Commons (FSC) in the Fall of 2007 marked a change in student life on the Vancouver campus.[8]

Although there is currently no on-campus housing, WSU Vancouver offers many activities and events for students. For example, there are many student-run organizations such as a History Club, Cougar Pride LGBT club and KOUG radio. KOUG Radio is a student-run radio station that occasionally features radio shows broadcast by DJs, most of whom are students at the university. Another student-run organization is the Salmon Creek Journal, a visual arts and literary magazine created by students, alumni and faculty.[9]

  • Enrollment (Fall 2020): 3,504 students
  • Average age(s) of student: 33–36
  • Female: 55%
  • Male: 45%
  • 6% of students are veterans
  • 45% first generation students
  • 31% ethnic minority students
  • 1:14 faculty:student ratio

Alumni

[edit]

A total of 17,228 graduates have completed study at WSU Vancouver. Roughly 92 percent of alumni remain in the area.[10] As the campus is located close to many industrial and tech corporations, most of the WSU Vancouver alumni works in nearby companies located in Washington, Oregon, and California.

WSU Vancouver in January 2014.
[edit]

In the novel Fifty Shades of Grey, the main character, Anastasia Steele, attends and graduates from WSU Vancouver.[11] In response to this association, Avantika Bawa, a professor of Fine Arts at WSU Vancouver curated a 2013 show of student work titled 'Better Shades of Grey'.[12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Durbin, Kathie (May 15, 2010). "WSUV's first four-year class receives degrees". The Columbian. Retrieved July 15, 2012.
  2. ^ Geography Division (April 10, 2021). 2020 CENSUS - CENSUS BLOCK MAP: Mount Vista CDP, WA (PDF) (Map). U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved March 23, 2025. - Compare to the map and street address: "14204 NE Salmon Creek Avenue Vancouver, WA, USA 98686-9600"
  3. ^ a b "History of the WSU Vancouver campus". WSU Vancouver. A University is Born and Making a Difference. Retrieved October 30, 2024.
  4. ^ Bradshaw, Leanna (December 13, 1990). "Salmon Creek Area Picked for WSU Site". The Oregonian.
  5. ^ "Degrees, Majors and Programs - Admissions - WSU Vancouver". vancouver.wsu.edu. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  6. ^ "Washington State University - Graduate Studies". sbs.wsu.edu. Retrieved February 26, 2014.
  7. ^ "WSU Labs". Washington State University.
  8. ^ History of the WSU Vancouver campus [1] Retrieved on 24 February 2014
  9. ^ WSU Vancouver. "Salmon Creek Journal". WSU Vancouver. Archived from the original on April 23, 2016. Retrieved October 31, 2012.
  10. ^ "About WSU Vancouver". WSU Vancouver.
  11. ^ Rice, Stephanie (February 9, 2024). "'50 Shades' of Vancouver revealed". The Columbian. Retrieved February 12, 2024.
  12. ^ "'Better Shades of Grey' aims to shine flattering light on WSUV". The Columbian. November 27, 2013. Retrieved February 22, 2019.
[edit]

45°43′52″N 122°38′13″W / 45.73111°N 122.63694°W / 45.73111; -122.63694

 

Fort Vancouver is located in the United States
Fort Vancouver
 
 
Fort Vancouver National Historic Site
 
Fort Vancouver in 1845
Fort Vancouver is located in Washington (state)
Fort Vancouver
 

LocationVancouver, Washington, United StatesCoordinates 45°37′21″N 122°39′45″W / 45.62250°N 122.66250°W / 45.62250; -122.66250BuiltWinter 1824–1825NRHP reference No.66000370[1]Added to NRHPOctober 15, 1966

Fort Vancouver was a 19th-century fur trading post built in the winter of 1824–1825.[2] It was the headquarters of the Hudson's Bay Company's Columbia Department, located in the Pacific Northwest. Named for Captain George Vancouver, the fort was located on the northern bank of the Columbia River in present-day Vancouver, Washington. The fort was a major center of the regional fur trading. Every year trade goods and supplies from London arrived either via ships sailing to the Pacific Ocean or overland from Hudson Bay via the York Factory Express. Supplies and trade goods were exchanged with a plethora of Indigenous cultures for fur pelts. Furs from Fort Vancouver were often shipped to the Chinese port of Guangzhou where they were traded for Chinese manufactured goods for sale in the United Kingdom. At its pinnacle, Fort Vancouver watched over 34 outposts, 24 ports, six ships, and 600 employees. Today, a full-scale replica of the fort, with internal buildings, has been constructed and is open to the public as Fort Vancouver National Historic Site.

Background

[edit]
Map of the Pacific Northwest "jointly occupied" by the US and Britain. The influence of Fort Vancouver and its secondary stations extended from Russian America to Mexican ruled Alta California.

During the War of 1812, the Pacific Northwest was a distant region of the conflict. Two rival fur trading outfits, the Canadian North West Company (NWC) and the American Pacific Fur Company (PFC), had until then both operated in the region peaceably. Funded largely by John Jacob Astor, the PFC operated without many opportunities for military defense by the United States Navy. News of the war and of a coming British warship put the American company in a difficult position. In October 1813, management met at Fort Astoria and agreed to transfer its assets to the NWC. HMS Racoon arrived the following month and in honor of George III of the United Kingdom, Fort Astoria was renamed to Fort George.[3]

In negotiations with American Albert Gallatin throughout 1818, British plenipotentiary Frederick John Robinson was offered a proposition for a partition that would have, as Gallatin stated, "all the waters emptying in the sound called the Gulf of Georgia."[4] Frederick Merk has argued the definition used by the negotiators of the Gulf of Georgia included the entirety of the Puget Sound, in addition to the Straits of Georgia and Juan de Fuca.[5] This would have given the United Kingdom the most favorable location for ports north of Alta California and south of Russian America.[6] Robinson did not agree to the proposal and subsequent talks did not focus on establishing a permanent border west of the Rocky Mountains.

The Treaty of 1818 made the resources of the vast region were to be "free and open" to citizens from either nation.[7] The treaty wasn't made to combine American and British interests against other colonial powers in the region. Rather, the document states that the joint occupancy of the Pacific Northwest was intended to "prevent disputes" between the two nations from arising.[7] In the ensuing years, the North West Company continued to expand its operations in the Pacific Northwest. Skirmishes with its major competitor, the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC), had already flared into the Pemmican War. The end of the conflict in 1821 saw the NWC mandated by the British Government to merge into the HBC.

Later negotiations

[edit]

Throughout 1825 and 1826, British officials continued to offer Americans partition plans for the Pacific Coast of North America. These largely originated in part from correspondence with the NWC and later HBC. The border would continue to extend west on the 49th parallel to the Rocky Mountains, where the Columbia (and some times the Snake River) would be used as the border until it reached the Pacific Ocean. Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs George Canning has been appraised by later historians as the most supportive British Foreign minister in securing a border along the Columbia.[8] United States Secretary of State Henry Clay had given instructions to the American plenipotentiaries to offer a partition of the Pacific Northwest along the 49th parallel to the Pacific Ocean.[9] The difference in the two considered plans were too much to solve, making the diplomats put off a formal colonial division once more.

Establishment

[edit]
Hudson's Bay Company Flag

Fort Vancouver was established on the north bank of the Columbia River in the winter of 1824–1825.[2] The London-based Hudson's Bay Company established it to serve as the headquarters of the Company's interior fur trade.[10] In the early 1820s a general reorganization of all NWC properties, now entirely under HBC management, was overseen directly by Sir George Simpson. The newly established Columbia District needed a more suitable headquarters than Fort George at the mouth of the Columbia. Simpson was instrumental in the establishment of Fort Vancouver.[11] Using the HBC position that any settlement of the Oregon boundary dispute would confirm the border placement along the Columbia; Simpson selected a location situated opposite from the mouth of the Willamette River. This expanse was an open and fertile prairie that was outside the flood plain and had easy access to the Columbia.[12]

Fort

[edit]

Description

[edit]
Cots in the Douglas Quarters inside the Chief Factor's house

An employee of the HBC, wrote a general description of Fort Vancouver and its structural composition as it was in 1843:

The fort is in the shape of a parallelogram, about 250 yards long, by 150 broad; enclosed by a sort of wooden wall, made of pickets, or large beams firmly fixed in the ground, and closely fitted together, twenty feet high, and strongly secured on the inside by buttresses. At each angle there is a bastion, mounting two twelve pounders, and in the centre there some eighteen pounders; ... these cannon have become useless. The area within is divided into two courts, around which are arranged about forty neat, strong wooden buildings, one story high, designed for various purposes...[13]

The fort was substantial. The palisades that protected it were 750 ft (230 m) long, 450 ft (140 m) wide and about 20 ft (6.1 m) high. Inside, there were 24 buildings, including housing, warehouses, a school, a library, a pharmacy, a chapel, a blacksmith, plus a large manufacturing facility. The Chief Factor's residence in the center of Fort Vancouver was two stories tall. Inside was a dining hall where company clerks, traders, physicians, and others of the gentleman class would dine with the supervising Chief Factor.[14] In general, the entirety of the Chief Factor's House and its meals were typically barred for general laborers and fur trappers.[15] After dinner the majority of these gentlemen would relocate to the "Bachelor's Hall" to "amuse themselves as they please, either in smoking, reading, or telling and listening to stories of their own and others' curious adventures".[16] As Dunn recalled;

The smoking room ... presents the appearance of an armory and a museum. All sorts of weapons, and dresses, and curiosities of civilized and savage life, and of the various implements for the prosecution of the [fur] trade, may be seen there.[15]

Outside the ramparts there was additional housing, as well as fields, gardens, fruit orchards, a shipyard, a distillery, a tannery, a sawmill, and a dairy. By 1843, situated roughly 600 yards outside Fort Vancouver were about sixty wooden houses. This small settlement was inhabited by fur trappers, machinists and other laborers of the fort. There they resided with their Indigenous or Métis wives and families. The dwellings were organized into orderly rows.[17] The settlement was commonly referred to as Kanaka Village because of the many Hawaiians in company employ who lived there. In fact, it has been suggested that the Fort had the "largest single group of Hawaiians ever to congregate outside their home islands".[18]

Fur trade operations

[edit]

With high demand from Europe for fur-based textiles in the early 19th Century, the HBC was forced to expand its fur trade operations across North America to the Pacific Northwest. Prior to the establishment of Fort Vancouver, the HBC's largest westward fort was Fort William in present-day Ontario, which the company gained through its merger with the NWC. From its establishment, Fort Vancouver was the regional headquarters of the HBC's fur trade operations in the Columbia District.[19] The territory it oversaw stretched from the Rocky Mountains in the east to the Pacific Ocean in the west, and from Sitka in the north to San Francisco in the south. Fur trappers would bring pelts collected during the winter to the fort to be traded in exchange for company credit. The credit, issued by the company clerks, could be used to purchase goods in the fort's trade shops. Furs from throughout the Columbia District were brought to Fort Vancouver from smaller HBC outposts either overland, or by water via the Columbia River. Once they were sorted and inventoried by the company's clerks, the furs were hung out to dry in the fur storehouse, a large two-story post-on-sill building located within the walls of the fort. After the furs had been processed, they were mixed, weighed into 270-pound (120 kg) bundles, and packed with tobacco leaves as an insecticide. The 270-pound bundle of furs would be placed in a large press and wrapped in elk or bear hide to create overseas fur bales. The large 270-pound bales were then placed on boats on the Columbia River for shipment to London via the HBC trade routes. The furs would then be auctioned off to textile manufacturers in London. A large demand came from hatters who produced popular beaver felted hats.

Personnel

[edit]

For most of its existence, Fort Vancouver was the largest non-Indigenous settlement in the Pacific Northwest. The population of the fort and the environs was mostly French Canadians, Métis, and Kanaka Hawaiians; there were also English, Scots, Irish, and a variety of Indigenous peoples including Iroquois and Cree. The common language spoken at the fort was Canadian French, while company records and official journals were kept in English. However, trading and relations with the surrounding community were done in Chinook Jargon, a pidgin of Chinook, Nootka, Chehalis, English, French, Hawaiian, and other elements.

A survey of the total personnel at Fort Vancouver in 1846 reveals a culturally and materially diverse populace. Notably, the number of employees from the Hebrides, Orkney, and Shetland Islands was 57 men. This is exactly the same number as the combined number of workers from England and mainland Scotland.[20] The number of men hired from Upper Canada, Lower Canada, and Rupert's Land was in total 91. These men came from English, French Canadian, Métis, Iroquois, Cree, and other cultural backgrounds. Most notable however, was that Kanaka Hawaiians totaled 154 that year, or 43% of the total fort population.[20]

Chief Factor Dr. John McLoughlin was its first manager, a position he held for nearly 22 years, from 1824 to 1845.[11] McLoughlin applied the laws of Upper Canada to British subjects, kept peace with the natives and sought to maintain law and order with American settlers as well. McLoughlin was later hailed as the Father of Oregon for allowing Americans to settle south of the Columbia River. Against the company's wishes, he provided substantial aid and assistance to westbound American settlers in the territory. He left the company in 1846 to found Oregon City in the Willamette Valley.

James Douglas spent nineteen years in Fort Vancouver; serving as a clerk until 1834 when he was promoted to the rank of Chief Trader. From October 1838 to November 1839, while McLoughlin was on furlough in Europe, Chief Trader Douglas was in charge. In November 1839 Douglas was promoted to the rank of Chief Factor. Douglas took on several temporary assignments elsewhere, to set up HBC's trading post at Yerba Buena (San Francisco) California in 1841, and to establish Fort Victoria in 1843, but from 1839 to 1845 there were normally two Chief Factors based at Fort Vancouver, with McLoughlin in charge and Douglas as his subordinate.[21]

Agricultural production

[edit]

At its inception, Governor George Simpson wanted the fort to be self-sufficient as food was costly to ship. Fort staff typically maintained one year's extra supplies in the fort warehouses to avoid the disastrous consequences of shipwrecks and other calamities. Fort Vancouver eventually began to produce a surplus of food, some of which was used to provision other HBC posts in the Columbia Department. The area around the fort was commonly known as "La Jolie Prairie" (the pretty prairie) or "Belle Vue Point" (beautiful vista). In time, Fort Vancouver diversified its economic activities beyond fur trading and begin exporting agricultural foodstuffs from HBC farms, along with salmon, lumber, and other products. It developed markets for these exports in Russian America, the Hawaiian Kingdom, and Mexican California. The HBC opened agencies in Sitka, Honolulu, and Yerba Buena (San Francisco) to facilitate such trade.[22]

Express

[edit]
Route of the HBC York Factory Express, 1820s to 1840s. Modern political boundaries shown.

Fort Vancouver was supplied in part through the overland York Factory Express. It originated from a route used by the NWC between Fort George to Fort William on Lake Superior.[23] Each spring two brigades were sent, one from Fort Vancouver and the other from York Factory. A typical brigade consisted of about forty to seventy five men. These men carried supplies, furs and correspondence by boat, horseback and in backpacks for various HBC posts and personnel along the route. Furs stored at the York Factory would in turn be sold at London in an annual fur sale. Indians along the way were often paid in trade goods to help them portage around falls and unnavigable rapids.

Americans

[edit]

The HBC, which controlled the fur trade in much of what Americans styled the Oregon Country, had previously discouraged settlement because it interfered with the lucrative fur trade. By 1838, however, American settlers were coming across the Rocky Mountains and their numbers increased each subsequent year. Many left from St. Louis, Missouri, and followed a fairly straight, but difficult, route called the Oregon Trail. For many settlers the fort became the last stop on the Oregon Trail where they could get supplies before starting their homestead.

During the Great Migration of 1843 an estimated 700 to 1,000 American settlers arrived via the Oregon Trail.

British response

[edit]
Fort Vancouver in 1859

The signing of the RAC-HBC Agreement with the Russian-American Company pushed the HBC into creating an agricultural subsidiary, the Pugets Sound Agricultural Company in 1840. Herds of sheep and cattle were purchased in Alta California and raised at Fort Nisqually. Agricultural products were sown and grown in abundance at Fort Cowlitz and exported with foodstuffs produced at Fort Vancouver to Russian America. Recruitment from retired HBC laborers residing in the Willamette Valley as agriculturalists, through the use of priests François Norbert Blanchet and Modeste Demers,[24] utterly failed to convince any farmer to leave for vicinity of the Cowlitz farms.[25] While additional plans called for recruitment in Scotland, these too came to nothing.[26]

The only successful source of early colonists for the PSAC would come from the Red River colony. In November 1839, Sir George Simpson instructed Duncan Finlayson to begin promoting the PSAC to colonists.[27] James Sinclair was later appointed by Finlayson to guide the settler families that signed the PSAC agreement to Fort Vancouver.[28] They left Fort Garry (modern Winnipeg) in June 1841 with 121 people that consisted of 23 families. When they arrived at Fort Vancouver, they then numbered 21 families of 116 people.[28] Fourteen of them were relocated to Fort Nisqually, while the remaining seven families were sent to Fort Cowlitz.[29]

Oregon Treaty

[edit]

Signed in 1846, the Oregon Treaty set the Canada–United States border at the 49th parallel north, putting Fort Vancouver within American territory. Although the treaty ensured that the HBC could continue to operate and had free access to navigate the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Puget Sound, and the Columbia River, company operations were effectively stifled by the treaty and became unprofitable and were soon closed down.

Restoration

[edit]
The modern reconstruction, showing the outer palisade and the single corner bastion.

Because of its significance in United States history a plan was put together to preserve the location. Fort Vancouver was declared a US National Monument on June 19, 1948, and redesignated as Fort Vancouver National Historic Site on June 30, 1961. This was taken a step further in 1996 when a 366-acre (1.48 km2) area around the fort, including Kanaka Village, the Columbia Barracks and the bank of the river, was established as the Vancouver National Historic Reserve maintained by the National Park Service. It is possible to tour the fort. Notable buildings of the restored Fort Vancouver include a bake house, where hardtack baking techniques are shown,[30] a blacksmith shop,[31] a carpenter shop and its collection of carpentry tools,[32] and the kitchen, where daily meals were prepared.[33]

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ "National Register Information System – (#66000370)". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. January 23, 2007.
  2. ^ a b "Fort Vancouver". National Park Service.
  3. ^ Franchère & Huntington 1854, pp. 190–193, 200–201.
  4. ^ Merk 1950, p. 538.
  5. ^ Merk 1950, pp. 538–539.
  6. ^ Merk 1950, p. 539.
  7. ^ a b Miller 1931, p. 660.
  8. ^ Galbraith 1957a, pp. 184–188.
  9. ^ Meany 1914, p. 221.
  10. ^ "The Hudson's Bay Company's Fort Vancouver". National Park Service.
  11. ^ a b Mackie 1997, p. 318.
  12. ^ Dunn 1844, p. 141.
  13. ^ Dunn 1844, pp. 143–144.
  14. ^ "The Chief Factor's House". Archived from the original on 2018-01-04. Retrieved 2018-01-04.
  15. ^ a b Dunn 1844, p. 145.
  16. ^ Dunn 1844, p. 144.
  17. ^ Dunn 1844, p. 147.
  18. ^ Koppel 1995, p. 20.
  19. ^ "Founding of the HBC's Fort Vancouver – Fort Vancouver National Historic Site (U.S. National Park Service)". www.nps.gov. Archived from the original on 4 January 2018. Retrieved 6 April 2018.
  20. ^ a b Winter 1967, pp. 186–187.
  21. ^ Watson 2010, pp. 340, 673, 1052–1056.
  22. ^ Mackie 1997, p. xviii–xxiii.
  23. ^ Mackie 1997, p. 61.
  24. ^ Blanchet et al. 1956, p. 10.
  25. ^ Galbraith 1954, pp. 247–248.
  26. ^ Galbraith 1954, p. 249.
  27. ^ Galbraith 1954, p. 252.
  28. ^ a b Galbraith 1954, p. 254.
  29. ^ Galbraith 1954, pp. 254–255.
  30. ^ "Reconstructed "Bake Shop"". Archived from the original on 2010-04-29. Retrieved 2010-04-28.
  31. ^ "Blacksmith Shop – Fort Vancouver National Historic Site (U.S. National Park Service)". www.nps.gov. Archived from the original on 7 April 2018. Retrieved 6 April 2018.
  32. ^ "Carpenter Shop – Fort Vancouver National Historic Site (U.S. National Park Service)". www.nps.gov. Archived from the original on 7 April 2018. Retrieved 6 April 2018.
  33. ^ "Kitchen – Fort Vancouver National Historic Site (U.S. National Park Service)". www.nps.gov. Archived from the original on 7 April 2018. Retrieved 6 April 2018.

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]